Skip to content
LegislationProposed

A00198: New York's Proposed Voluntary Firearms Purchase Waiver Program

Proposed

A00198: New York's Proposed Voluntary Firearms Purchase Waiver Program

Assembly Bill A198A and its Senate companion S1026A would let an individual voluntarily waive the right to purchase firearms, with a 21-day revocation waiting period. A198A last advanced to Assembly third reading on April 23, 2026. S1026A passed the Senate on June 1, 2026 and was referred to Assembly Codes that day.

Legislation
●Reviewed Oct 16, 2026

Assembly Bill A00198, introduced on January 8, 2025 by Assemblywoman Amy Paulin and co-sponsored by Assemblymembers Dinowitz, Seawright, Lupardo, Otis, K. Brown, Bores, and Meeks, would create a voluntary self-exclusion program for firearm purchases in New York. The bill reached the Third Reading calendar in the Assembly the week of April 23, 2026.[1]

What the Bill Would Do

A00198 would amend the Executive Law by adding a new Section 221-e, establishing a voluntary waiver of the right to purchase firearms, rifles, or shotguns. Under the program, any individual may file a waiver with the New York State Police, after which that person would be prohibited from purchasing any firearm, rifle, or shotgun. The Division of State Police would verify the individual's identity before accepting the waiver and enter it within 24 hours of receipt into the New York State National Instant Criminal Background Check System and any other state computer-based systems used to identify prohibited purchasers of firearms, rifles, or shotguns.[1]

Revocation Process

The waiver is not permanent. A person may file a revocation with the State Police, which would again verify identity before accepting it. Twenty-one days after receiving the revocation, the State Police would remove the individual from the New York State National Instant Criminal Background Check System and any other state computer-based systems used to identify prohibited purchasers, to indicate that the individual is no longer prohibited because of the voluntary waiver. The 21-day waiting period is designed to serve as a deliberate buffer between the request to restore access and the actual restoration of purchase eligibility.

Privacy and Anti-Coercion Protections

The bill includes two significant protections. First, a waiver may not be required of any individual as a condition for employment, benefits, or services. Second, records maintained under the program would be confidential and could not be disclosed in matters involving health care, employment, education, housing, insurance, government benefits, or contracting. Information about a waiver filer could only be used to determine that person's eligibility to receive a firearm.

Criminal Penalty

Any person who knowingly makes a false statement about their identity when filing a voluntary waiver would be guilty of offering a false instrument for filing in the second degree under Penal Law Section 175.30, a class A misdemeanor.

Context

The voluntary purchase waiver concept has gained support among suicide prevention advocates. Researchers have documented that many firearm-related suicides are impulsive, and that self-exclusion programs give individuals struggling with suicidal ideation a tool to reduce their own access to lethal means during a crisis. Similar voluntary exclusion programs operate in the context of gambling. Virginia enacted a comparable firearms self-exclusion law in 2020, and proposals have circulated in several other states. If enacted, the bill would take effect on the ninetieth day after becoming law.

Legislative Status

A00198 was introduced in January 2025, referred to the Committee on Governmental Operations, and reached the Third Reading calendar in the Assembly the week of April 23, 2026. The Senate companion bill, S1026A, passed the Senate on June 1, 2026 and was delivered to the Assembly and referred to Codes that day. The last recorded action for A198A was advancement to Assembly third reading on April 23, 2026. Neither bill has been signed into law. The simultaneous advancement of both bills in their respective chambers increases the likelihood of floor votes before the session ends.